Wednesday, October 28, 2015

BAB II

CHAPTER II
THEORITICAL FRAMEWORK
2.1       LISTENING
            Listening come from a verb listen which means to make an effort to hear somebody or something. According to Howart and Dakin “listening is the ability to identify and understand what other are saying”. This involves understanding a speaker’s scent or pronounciation, his grammar and vocabulary and grasping his meaning”.[1]
Those definition above, clearly apply that listening ability is the skill that required to listen well to somebody or something. Listening ability is the ability or a power to relate the sound to meaning. When the student listen to a passage mean that he uses his listening ability to communicate with the passage by understanding the vocabulary spelling, grammar, and the meaning of the passage.
            Listening is one of four basic skill in which English students should be trained. Since training this skill is often neglected and the students have  few opportunities to listen to English spoken and non English speaking country, the improvement of the students’ listening comprehension will depend largely on effective teaching  in the classroom. Rost state that progress in listening will provide a basis for development of other language skill.[2] The statement implies that listening skill can support the students to master the other language skills. Listening in language teaching-learning process possesses important contribution to other major language skills and of course it must be taught in language teaching.
            According to Rost, there are three stages of listening process, there are Pre-listening, Whilst listening and post-listening.[3] The brief explanation of those activities as follow:
2.1.1    Pre-listening
            Pre-listening can be done in variety ways and occur naturally when listening is part of an integrated skills course and listening task is a link to a previous content-based activity. The pre-listening include:
1.      The teacher give the background information before the students listen to the text.
2.      The students read something relevant to the topic.
3.      The students look at the picture that prepare them for title topic.
4.      There is a class discussion of the topic or situation in the upcoming-test.
5.      There is a question-answer session with the class of a whole.
6.      The teacher gives written exercise to preview tile content.
7.      The students go over the tile procedures for the upcoming listening task.


2.1.2    Whilst listening
            After students get some experiences from the previous explanation and some vocabularies addition about the material, the teacher can teach them through some ways as follow:
1)      The teacher ask the students to listen to an oral text.
2)      The teacher reads the listening twice.
3)      The teacher asks the question about the text.
4)      The students answers the question in their answer sheet.
2.1.3    Post-listening
            In post-listening activities, the teacher and students discuss the text by re-read the text. All of the activities above will serve to improve the students’ knowledge and they will need to listen as accurate as possible. This statement is in line with Rost’s opinion that students will motivated to listen and will activate what they know as they listen.[4]
2.2       Factor Affecting Listening Ability
            As the researcher said before that very important to develop students’ listening ability since it can improve their achievement in mastering English in general. Listening is highly individual experience that is influenced by many factors. According to Bromley there are three factor that affect listening.[5] Those factors are in the following:
2.2.1    Listener factor
            The listener factor include:
1)      Purpose
            It is enotmously important that before listening the students are motivated to listen. This will increase their ability to do these thing after they have finished listening providing a purpose for listen perhaps the single most important responsibility of the classroom teacher and the one of the most neglected.
2). Conceptual level
            Children who possess a fund of knowledge based on both first-hand and various learning language possess the required concepts and meaning to associate with the spoken language. The fluency with which children process language also affect listening.
3). Experience
            Children who have not been expected to listen and comprehend, and thus not has successful comprehension experiences may have the harder time than children who had many meaningful comprehension interaction. While this is not always the case, in the general, success foster more of the same kind of success.
4). Comprehension monitoring of strategies
            Children who are affective listener are actively engage in controlling meaning. They check or monitoring their understanding of what is heard in many ways. They associate their information with what already known, they ask the accuracy or meaning of what they hear, they paraphrase or top the speaker and request the message be repeated or explained when it is not meaningful.
 2.2.2   Situational Factor
            The situational factor include:
1). Environment
            The environment in which listening occurs must be free from distraction and arranged to heighten listening so that the listener focuses and concentrates attention on the verbal message.
2). Visuals
            The concrete visual stimuli provide children in listening situation can increase comprehension. Visual aids can be chalkboard, overhead projector, picture and etc. The students will easily learn something by the visual aids.
2.2.3    Speaker Factor
            The speaker factor include:
1). Redundancy
            The student’s difficulties in mastering listening materials can be reduce by using gestures, body movements, countors of the face, expression of mouth and eyes. Paraphrasing and repeating a message also helps the students to understand and remember it.
2). Pronounciation
            According to Bromley that clear and distinct pronounciation along with the use of appropriate pitch, stress and juncture also affect listening comprehension. Correct and careful pronounciation of words contributes to the receipt of accurate message.
3). Eye Contact
            The listener is more apt to hear and understand appropriate message delivered by a speaker who maintains direct eye contact than one who looks at the ceiling, wall or the top of the listeners’ head.
2.3       DICTATION
2.3.1    Definition of Dictation
            Oller defined “dictation is a task which require the processing of temporally constrained sequence of material in the language divided up the stream of speech and then refer down what is heard requires understanding the meaning of the material”.[6] From the definition, we may conclude that dictation is a kind of test that not only challenge students’ short term memory and understanding in spelling vocabulary but also to understand the meaning of what is said. The students are hoped to perceive the contents of the passage and recognized all the words and sentences being read so that they are able to put these aural codes into written symbols.
            Dictation is used to evaluate most of the aspect of language simultaneously.[7] Its main purpose is to check the proficiency of the students about the language being learned through listening ability. It means that when the students do dictation test, they do not pay attention to the sound of the words read by the teacher but also understand about the meaning and be able to transfer the dictated passage to their graphical representations. They are forced to pay a comprehensive attention to the passage dictated and write down what they perceive by sound, sight and feeling in the second language at the same time span allowed for a response in the first language. Once they fail to concentrate on their listening, they will not able to make a quick guess what they actually have to write. It is clear implies that dictation is used to assess the students’ ability, in this case listening skill. Teacher hopes that this method of evaluation can motivate students in learning English and check whether the teaching aims have been satisfactorily fulfilled or not.
2.3.2    Type of Dictation
            In determining the kinds of dictation as a testing device, the teacher should have a look at the material provided. To prepare which kind of dictation used, the teacher as the examiner should  realized the specific point to be gained in using each test. As a testing technique, dictation may be given by various ways. According to Oller there are five types of dictation procedure that have been used in a variety of ways testing techniques. Those five ways are elaborated as follows:
a)           Standard Dictation
            Standard dictation is probably the best known. Students are require to write verbal sequences of material of spoken by a teacher or played back from a recording. The material should be presented at a normal conversational speed and is given in sequences that are long enough to challenge students’ short term memory.
b)           Partial Dictation
            Partial dictation also called spot dictation. This type has a close relation with the standard dictation, but the students are given either a written version of the text or the spoken one. The written version has certain portion which are deleted. The students must listen to the spoken material and fill in the missing portion in the written version. It is easier to perform because more sensory information is given concerning the message; a partial written version and a complete spoken version.
c)           Dictation with competing noise
            This type of dictation is rather difficult because the material is presented with adding noise. This kind of dictation drills the students to be used to everyday communication context where language is used in less than ideal acoustic condition; for example, we are trying to have conversation in someone’s living room when the television and air conditioner are producing a high level  of competing noise or trying to hear a message over a public address system in a busy air station, etc.
d)          Dicto – Comp
            This type of dictation is actually a combination of two forms, namely dictation and composition. Here, the teacher read the whole passage three time and the students are only given chance to write their work after the teacher has finished the tird reading. They should recall the whole story and write the story as a reproduction of what they heard.

e)           Elicited Imitation
            In this case, the students listen to the material, but instead of writing down the material, the students are asked to repeat it or otherwise recount what was said. The condition of class, whether noisy or not will determine the success or failure in administering the process of dictation test. The teacher should strictly consider the readiness of the students before facing the dictation test with the hope to get the test successfully.
2.3.3    The Advantage of Dictation
             Dictation has been used in language learning for several hundred years. However, the use of dictation has always been controversional. It has not always been looked on with favor by some expert. For example, Lado says that dictation is favored by many teacher and students both as teaching and testing device, but on critical inspection it appears to measure  very little of language.[8] In line with lado’s opinion, Harris believe that as a testing device, dictation must be regarded as generally uneconomical and imprecis.[9]
            Contrary to those two belief above, Davis and Rinvolucri found out that dictation can be very useful as a test by which to ascertain the pupil’s progress in spelling, punctuation and pronounciation.[10] The further stated that dictation is an activity which is suitable for a wide range of levels and ages.
            The following are some advantage of dictation according to Montalvan:[11]
a)       Dictation can help develop all four language skills in an integrative way.
b)      As students develop their aural comprehension of meaning also of the relationship among segments of language, they are learning grammar.
c)      Dictation help to develop short term–memory. Students practice retaining meaningful phrases or whole sentences before writing them down.
d)      Practice in careful listening to dictation will be useful later on in note taking exercise.
e)      Correcting dictation can lead to oral communication.
f)       Dictation can serve as an excellent review exercise.
g)      Dictation is psychologically powerful and challenging.
h)      Dictation fosters un conscious thinking in the new language.
i)        If the students do well, dictation is motivating.
j)        Dictation involve the whole class, no matter how large it is.
k)      During and after the dictation, all students are active.
l)        Correction can be done by students.
m)    Dictation can be prepared for mixed ability groups.
n)      Dictation can be prepared for any level.
o)      The students, as well as the teacher, can get instant feedback (if the exercise is corrected immidiately).
p)      The dictation passage can (and should) be completely prepared in advanced (it also can be taped).
q)      Dictation can be administered quite affectively by an inexperienced teacher.
r)       Dictation exercise can pull the class together, for example, during those valuable first minute.
s)       Dictation can provide access to interesting texts, by introducing a topic, for example, or summarizing it, as in dicto-comp.
t)       Research has shown the learning to write down what you hear can encourage the development of literacy.   
2.3.4    Materials and Procedure of Giving Dictation Test
            It is important for the teachers to make some preparation when they are going to give a dictation test to their students. Oller stated that, as an integrative test, dictation has to meet the naturalness requirements:[12]
a)      The sequences of words or phrases to be dictated are selected from normal prose, or dialogue, or some other natural form of discourse (or perhaps the sequences are carefully contrived to mirror normal discourse, as in well written function).
b)      The material is presented orally in sequences that are long enough to challenge the short-term memory of the learners.
            Based on those naturalness requirements, it is important for the teachers to make some preparation when they are going to give dictation test to their students. There are some requirements that must be followed, those are:
a.       Teachers have to select suitable materials to be dictated.
b.      The words dictated should have been taught to the students before.
c.       The words dictated should be selected or chosen from simple words.
d.      Teachers have to select suitable procedures which are appropriated in giving dictation test. There are two ways of giving dictation test; first is the teacher reads the words directly, and the second is the words dictated have been recorded before.
            From the requirements above, it is clear that the materials of dictation are any single words, compound words, word phrases, and sentences which are going to be dictated. The teacher can choose the material from the book provided and used as reference and the teacher may use a tape recorder as an aid in presenting the test.
            Besides preparing the materials, teachers have to select suitable procedures which are appropriated in giving dictation test. The procedures of the presentation can be arranged in two ways; the teacher himself reads the material in front of the class or uses a tape recorder as an aid in presenting the test. The teacher is required to read the passage three times in all: first, at normal speed; then, with pauses between phrases or natural word groups so that the students may write down what they have just heard, and finally, at normal speed once more so they can check their work.
2.4       ERROR ANALYSIS
2.4.1    Definition of Error Analysis
Errors in foreign language teaching especially in English are the cases which are difficult enough to avoid. Error analysis is the process of determinating the incidence, nature, causes, and consequences of unsuccessful language.[13] Error analysis is an activity to reveal errors found in writing and speaking. Error analysis also is the study of errors made by the second and foreign language learners. Error analysis may be carried out in order to (a) find out how well someone knows a language, (b) find out how a person learns a language, and (c) obtain information on common difficulties in language learning, as an aid in teaching or in the preparation of teaching materials. This definition stresses the functions of error analysis.[14]
Another concept of error analysis is analysis as the process to observe, analyze, and classify the deviations of the rules of the second language and then to reveal the systems operated by learner.[15] It seems this concept is the same as the one proposed by Crystal, Error analysis is a technique for identifying, classifying and systematically interpreting the unacceptable forms produced by someone learning a foreign language, using any of the principles and procedures provided by linguistics.[16] The three definitions above clarify that error analysis is an activity to identify, classify and interpreted or describe the errors made by someone in listening or in writing and it is carried out to obtain information on common difficulties faced by someone in listening or in writing English sentences. Another thing which should be noticed is the procedure of error analysis.
2.4.2    The Differences Between Error and Mistake
Sometimes we confuse to differentiate between error and mistake. If the learner is inclined and able to correct a fault in his or her output, it is assumed that the form he or she selected was not the one intended, and we shall say that the fault is a mistake. If, on the other hand, the learner is unable or in any way disinclined to make the correction, we assume that the form the learner used was the one intended, and that it is an error.[17]
Mistakes can only be corrected by their agent if their deviance is pointed out to him or her. If a simple indication that there is some deviance is a sufficient prompt for self correction, then we have a first-order mistake. If additional information is needed, in the form of the exact location and some hint as to the nature of the deviance, then we have a second-order mistake.
Errors cannot be self-corrected until further relevant (to that error) input (implicit or explicit) has been provided and converted into intake by the learner. In other words, errors require further relevant learning to take place before they can be self-corrected.[18]
According to Brown “a mistake concern with a performance error that is either a random guess or a slip, in that it is a failure to utilize a known system correctly. While an error, a noticeable deviation from the adult grammar of a native speaker reflects the competence of the learner.”[19]
            To be more classified between error and mistake, James explained an error could not be self-corrected, while a mistake can be self-corrected if the deviation is pointed out to the speaker.[20]
2.4.3    The Causes of Error
Causes of error classified into three types that is carelessness, first language interference, and translation.[21] The three types of causes of error will be discussed briefly below:
1)      Carelessness. It is often closely related to lack of motivation. Many teachers will admit that it is not always the student’s fault if he loses interest, perhaps the materials and/or style of presentation do not suit him.
2)      First language. Learning a language (a mother tongue or a foreign language) is a matter of habit formation. When someone tries to learn new habits the old ones will interfere the new ones. This cause of error is called first language interference”.
3)      Translation. It is one of the causes of error. This happens because a student translates his first language sentence or idiomatic expression in to the target language word by word. This is probably the most common cause of error.




2.4.3    The Kinds of Error
Errors divided into four categories: omission of some required element, addition of some necessary or incorrect element, selection of an incorrect element, and miss-ordering of element.[22] And here are the explanations:
a. Omission
Certain linguistic forms may be omitted by the learners because of their complexity in production. Omission also occurs in morphology. Learners often leave out the third person singular morpheme –s, the plural marker –s and the past tense inflection –ed. A learner could say, for example: “I watch the movie last night”. Instead of: “I watched the movie last night”.
b. Addition
Learners not only omit elements which they regard as redundant but they also add redundant element. For example: - I swims - The books is here Instead of: “I swim” and “The book is here”
c. Selection
Learners commit errors in pronunciation, morphology, syntax and vocabulary due to the selection of the wrong, phoneme, morpheme, structure or vocabulary item. For example: “Fika is smartest than Femy”. Instead of “Fika is smarter than Femy”.
d. Ordering
Miss-ordering can occur in morphological level. Miss-ordering of bound morpheme in English is perhaps less frequent, given their limited number, but in the example “He is got upping now”, the learners attaches the inflection –ing to the particle of the two words verb “get up”.
Students’ errors may be distinguished as follows:
Ø  Errors Performance is unsystematic and not very serious, because the students themselves can correct them when their attention is drawn to them. These errors are attributed to carelessness, lapse of memory, ill health, emotional health, etc., and they should not worry us.
Ø  Errors Competence is persistent and systematic and in consequence serious, and their treatment calls for careful analysis to discover their cause. These errors represent the learners’ traditional competence.





                [1]Hornby AS, Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary (New York: Oxford University Press, 1995).P.687
                [2]Rost, M, Listening Action Activities for Developing Listening in Language Teaching (London:Prentice Hall,1991).P. 3
                [3] Rost M, Teaching and Researching Listening (London: Longman Group Ltd,2002).P.142
                [4]Rost M, Teaching and Researching Listening (London: Longman Group Ltd,2002).P.14
                [6]Oller J.W, Language Tests at schools, (London: Longman Group Ltd, 1997).P.39
                [7]Oller J.W, Language Tests at schools.P.40
                [8]Lado R, Language Testing (London:Longman Group Ltd,1964).P.34
                [9]David Haris P, Testing English as Second Language (Mc Graw-Hill: Inc,1969).P.5
                [10]Paul Davis and Mario Rinvolucri, Dictation-New Methods New Possibilities (New York:Cambridge University Press,1993).P.122
                [11]Montalvan, R. Dictation updated: Guidelines for teacher-training workshops ( In English Language Programs, U.S. Department of State: 1990)
                [12] Oller J.W, Language Test at School (London: Longman, 1997).P. 37
                [13] Carl James, Errors in Language Learning and Use; Exploring Error Analysis, (London : Addison Wesley Longman Limited, 1998). P.1
                [14]J.C. Richards, Error Analysis (London: Longman, 1973). P.96
                [15]H.D. Brown, Principles of Language Learning and Teaching (New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc, 1980).P.166
                [16]D.Crystal, The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987). P. 112
                [17] Carl James. Errors in Language ..., p.78
                [18] Carl James. Errors in Language ..., p.83
                [19]H. Douglas Brown, Principle of Language Learning and Teaching (New York: Person Longman, 2007). P.257
                [20]J. Norrish, Language Learning and their Error. (London: Macmillan Publisher Ltd, 1987), P.7
                [21]J. Norrish. Language Learning ..., p.8
                [22]J.C. Richards, Error Analysis . . . p.97

No comments:

Post a Comment